Technical

Non-Crediting Event

Glossary Term

Technical

Non-Crediting Event

Glossary Term

Technical

Non-Crediting Event

Glossary Term

What is a non-crediting event?

A non-crediting event is a step in an offer that fires a tracking signal but awards no currency. It exists so advertisers can measure a milestone without paying for it, and it should never be presented to a user as a reward.

What is a non-crediting event?

A non-crediting event is a step in an offer that fires a tracking signal but awards no currency. It exists so advertisers can measure a milestone without paying for it, and it should never be presented to a user as a reward.

What is a non-crediting event?

A non-crediting event is a step in an offer that fires a tracking signal but awards no currency. It exists so advertisers can measure a milestone without paying for it, and it should never be presented to a user as a reward.

A non-crediting event behaves like any other event in that it fires when the user reaches it, but its reward value is zero and it is never credited. It is a measurement checkpoint wearing the same clothes as a rewarded step.

How it works

The advertiser marks a milestone as worth observing but not worth paying for: a registration started, a page viewed, a tutorial opened. When the user reaches it, a postback fires so both sides can record that it happened. No reward is issued and no payout is made.

Why advertisers use them

They make a funnel legible without changing its economics. An advertiser who pays on purchase still wants to know how many users registered and then stopped, because that gap tells them whether the problem is their offer or their signup flow. Non-crediting events supply that visibility at no cost, and they often lead to the advertiser improving the funnel in ways that benefit the publisher too.

The integration mistake to avoid

Rendering non-crediting events in the user-facing step list is the single most common error with this feature. It makes the offer appear to pay more than it does, and it produces a complaint the moment a user completes one and no currency arrives. The user did exactly what the screen told them to and received nothing, which from their side is indistinguishable from the wall being broken.

  • Filter them out of the reward display. Users should only see steps that pay.

  • Keep handling their postbacks. Your own analytics want the funnel data even though no reward is issued.

  • Exclude them from the advertised total. They contribute nothing to what the user can earn.

  • Do not count them as conversions. They will inflate completion counts and distort EPC against the offer.

Where non-crediting events appear

They cluster at the start of funnels, where an advertiser wants visibility into early drop-off without paying for it. A typical subscription offer might track the registration page, the plan selection, and the payment screen while paying only on the completed subscription. From the publisher's side that means a single offer can fire several signals before any revenue arrives, and treating each as a conversion will badly overstate both completion counts and EPC until the discrepancy is noticed.

Common misconceptions

  • A non-crediting event is not a failed conversion. It fired exactly as intended; it simply does not pay.

  • It is not a tracking error. Zero reward is the configured behaviour, not a misconfiguration.

  • It does not mean the offer is low value. Offers with substantial payouts frequently include tracking-only checkpoints along the way.

Frequently asked questions

Q: Why would an advertiser track something they do not pay for?

A: To see where users drop out. Knowing how many people started a registration and abandoned it tells the advertiser whether the problem is the offer or their own signup flow.

Q: Should non-crediting events appear on the wall?

A: Never in the reward list. Showing them makes the offer look like it pays more than it does, and produces a complaint the moment a user completes one and nothing arrives.

Q: Do they count as conversions?

A: No. Counting them inflates completion numbers and distorts EPC against the offer, which can lead a wall to rank it wrongly.